We are a country of innocent until proven guilty-why doesn’t this apply to voting. The burden of proof should be on those claiming certain votes are invalid. EVERY vote should count until you PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt that a vote shouldn’t count and give explicit reasons (not concerns) then give the voter an opportunity to remedy or defend their vote. Only then should a vote not count.
We are a country of innocent until proven guilty-why doesn’t this apply to voting. The burden of proof should be on those claiming certain votes are invalid. EVERY vote should count until you PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt that a vote shouldn’t count and give explicit reasons (not concerns) then give the voter an opportunity to remedy or defend their vote. Only then should a vote not count.
We are a country of innocent until proven guilty-why doesn’t this apply to voting. The burden of proof should be on those claiming certain votes are invalid. EVERY vote should count until you PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt that a vote shouldn’t count and give explicit reasons (not concerns) then give the voter an opportunity to remedy or defend their vote. Only then should a vote not count.
And there's NO defense for tossing that many votes!